Revill v casey outcome

See for example Gray v Thames Trains where Lord Hoffmann observed in relation to one wider approach to the principle of illegality: 51. I must therefore examine a wider version of the rule, which was applied by Flaux J. This has the support of the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Clunis’s case [1998] QB 978 as well as other authorities.

The main question in this appeal is whether government officers are entitled to qualified immunity for arresting attorneys Megan Garcia and Victor Revill for stashing their client's cellphone in a bag only minutes before the police executed a search warrant for child pornography on that phone. Sheriff's deputies Sue Ashworth...replaced by Casey’s undue burden standard, the outcome of the Supreme Court’s most recent abor-tion rights case, Gonzales v. Carhart, would have undoubtedly been very different. In Gonzales, the Court upheld the federal ban on so-called “partial-birth abortions,” in spite of the fact that the lawThe contribution of HDV and HBV diversity to clinical outcome in the setting of coinfection clearly requires further investigation. ... Revill, P., Testoni, B., Locarnini, S. & Zoulim, F. Global ...1:55:49Mins. VFL Match Replay, R1: Casey v Box Hill. The Demons and Hawks clash in round one of the 2024 Smithy's VFL Season. Watch Now.Goldex Mines Ltd. v. Revill et al., 1974 CanLII 433 (ON CA) Facts: Goldex, the minority shareholders asserted that the majority (Probe Mines Ltd) was taking corporate assets for their own benefit. Goldex has not received consent from the Court under the OBCA provisions, and therefore couldn’t bring a derivative action.Apr 11, 2018 · Login. Two Birmingham attorneys who were arrested over a year ago just outside the Blount County courthouse in Oneonta were tried and acquitted Thursday, March 29th. Attorneys Victor Revill and Megan Garcia were taken into custody on Feb. 23, 2017, after leaving the courthouse with their client, Loyd Edwards, who was appearing that day in court.

Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of two Missouri prison regulations. One of the prisoners' claims related to the fundamental right to marry, and the other related to freedom of speech (in sending/receiving letters). The court held that a regulation preventing inmates from marrying without permission violated their ...Education plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of any nation. To ensure that educational institutions are functioning effectively and providing quality education, it is essen...Do whatever you want with a Revill v. Casey et al 2:2019cv00114US District Court for the ...: fill, sign, print and send online instantly. Securely download your document with other editable templates, any time, with PDFfiller. No paper. No software installation. On any device & OS. Complete a blank sample electronically to save yourself time andIf 1973’s Roe has the name recognition, 1992’s Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey sets the “undue burden” standard by which restrictive abortion laws sprouting around ...2019 Jan-18 PM 04:25. U.S. DISTRICT COURT. N.D. OF ALABAMA. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION. VICTOR REVILL, Plaintiff, v. PAMELA CASEY, SCOTT GILLILAND, SUE ASHWORTH, AND BRYAN K. RATLIFF, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. …Advertisement It's probably better to say that zero was discovered rather than invented. This idea is supported by the number of places across time and space that it simply appeare...Docket for Garcia v. Casey, 2:18-cv-02079 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... CONSOLIDATION ORDER; The Court CONSOLIDATE Garcia v. Casey, 2:18-cv-02079-KOB and Revill v. Casey, 2:19-cv-00114-RDP pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. Signed by Chief Judge ...

State v. Casey, 215 Or App 76, 168 P3d 315 (2007). We allowed defendant's petition for review and now reverse the Court of Appeals decision and the trial court's judgment. Because this appeal arises from the trial court's denial of defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State vGet People v. Casey, 948 P.2d 1014 (1997), Colorado Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.REvil is a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation that has extorted large amounts of money from organizations worldwide over the past year. Its name stands for Ransomware Evil and was inspired ...Petitioner Thomas Dobbs argues that the Court should overturn the precedent establishing a constitutional right to pre-viability abortions— Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey—or alternatively, reject viability as a measuring tool. In response, Respondent Women's Health Center contends that the Court ...Bowers v. Hardwick Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: In 1982, respondent Hardwick was charged with violating Georgia’s anti-sodomy law after a law enforcement officer saw him committing sodomy in his home with another man. The local prosecutor declined to prosecute the case. Hardwick, however, was concerned that as a …

Rufus hibbett.

4. Plaintiff VICTOR REVILL is an individual over the age of nineteen (19) years and a resident of the United States currently residing in Alabama. 5. Defendant PAMELA CASEY is an individual over the age of nineteen (19) years and a resident of the United States. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendant Casey was theJOEL BENJAMIN REVILL: Defendant: WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN REGINA WHOMBLE, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DOCTOR SIGHT: Case Number: 5:2021cv00415: Filed: November 29, 2021: Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia:Argued: January 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001. Petitioner sponsors professional golf tournaments conducted on three annual tours. A player may gain entry into the tours in various ways, most commonly through successfully competing in a three-stage qualifying tournament known as the "Q-School." Any member of the public may enter the Q-School by ...Similarly, in Revill v Newbery, the burglar was not asking the court to award him the anticipated profits of the theft, but was seeking compensation for the harm inflicted upon his existing assets (his healthy body). ... In Tinsley v Milligan, the outcome under this proposed approach would be the same. The trust was created for the criminal ...

People v Casey (2023 NY Slip Op 51222 (U)) People v Casey. 2023 NY Slip Op 51222 (U) [81 Misc 3d 1203 (A)] Decided on November 20, 2023. Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County. Bowen, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the ...Case Summary and Outcome. The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa ruled that the criminal offense of defamation is not unconstitutional. ... S. Afr., S v Revill 1970 (3) SA 611 (C) S. Afr., R v MacDonald 1953 (1) SA 107 (T) S. …Garcia (Garcia Doc. 134), and by Defendants Casey and Gilliland against Mr. Revill (Revill Doc. 134). Ms. Casey and Mr. Gilliland also request summary judgment on Mr. Revill and Ms. Garcia's defamation claims on a number of immunity and evidentiary grounds. In short, the only outlier is that Plaintiffs Garcia and Revill did not move for summaryThis matter comes before the court on Defendants Pamela Casey and Scott Gilliland's motions to dismiss. (Garcia Doc. 25; Revill Doc. 2). 1. This consolidated action stems from the events of February 23, 2017...However, the Supreme Court abruptly cast aside Roe, Casey, and the constitutional right to freedom of choice in 2022. Its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization allowed states to regulate (or even ban) abortion at will. Many states responded to Dobbs by imposing harsh restrictions. The war over reproductive rights has ...Today, justice was finally served for attorneys Victor Revill and Megan Garcia. It has been over a year waiting for this day in court, and today they were acquitted of all charges in Blount County.... Today, justice was finally served for attorneys Victor Revill and Megan Garcia. ...Scott Gilliland ordered the arrest. Following the arrest, DA Casey, in a statement to the press, and ADA Gilliland, on the courthouse steps, publicly accused Garcia and Revill of concealing evidence of a crime and knowingly possessing child pornography. After Garcia and Revill were tried and acquitted for the state -Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey (91-744), 505 U.S. 833 (1992) NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for ...

In Planned Parenthood v.Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), a divided U.S. Supreme Court upheld Roe v. Wade with modifications, holding that States may regulate abortion only so long as the regulation does not place "undue burden on a woman's constitutional right to decide to terminate a pregnancy.". The Pennsylvania law that required a woman to obtain her husband's consent before having an abortion ...

The case involves an appeal (by Newbery (N)) against a damages award in a personal injury lawsuit initiated by Revill (R). R suffered a close-range gunshot wound inflicted by N when R trespassed onto N's allotment. N had been asleep inside his shed when he was awakened by R's attempt to break in.mIn response to the intrusion, N …In Roe v.Wade, 1 the United States Supreme Court held that the fundamental right to privacy encompassed in the Fourteenth Amendment's liberty guarantee was "broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." 2 In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 3 the Court reaffirmed that the right to choose to have an abortion was ...Analysis 2 This appeal is before us for the second time; for a more detailed account of the facts in the underlying case, see State v. Casey, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 144*, *2-7 (N.C. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2009). -3- STATE V. CASEY Opinion of the Court Defendant argues that the trial court should have granted his MAR based on the ineffective assistance ...JOEL BENJAMIN REVILL: Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Case Number: 7:2020cv00137: Filed: July 14, 2020: Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia: Presiding Judge: THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF: Referring Judge: W LOUIS SANDS: Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights: Cause of Action: 42 U ...Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey (91-744), 505 U.S. 833 (1992) NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for ...Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, legal case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1992, that redefined several provisions regarding abortion rights as established in Roe v. Wade (1973). Both Planned Parenthood v.Casey and Roe v.Wade were overturned by the Court in 2022.. In 1988 and 1989 the …Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his 12-bore ...The Court stated that criminal and civil defamation laws (which limit the right to freedom of expression) are in place to prevent the assassination of a person's character. Limiting freedom of expression in this manner is only constitutional if, "an appropriate balance is struck between the protection of freedom of expression on the one ...

Vaporub teeth whitening.

Tell city mugshots busted.

Who you choose to defend your case will be key in determining the outcome. Put the right attorney on your side. Revill Law Firm - Who you choose to defend your case will...A new threat to the cryptocurrency's stability has emerged Just as the bitcoin world thought it was safe, a new threat to the cryptocurrency’s stability has emerged. Last week, the...02-19-00325-CR. 06-24-2021. Christopher Revill, Appellant v. The State of Texas. DABNEY BASSEL JUSTICE. Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2 (b) On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1596013R. Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Bassel, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION.What You Need to Know About the Biggest Abortion Case Since Roe v. Wade Our federal abortion laws are stuck in the past. Mississippi wants its state law to reflect modern scientific knowledge. Written by Alliance Defending Freedom Published March 21, 2022 ...A state law that predictably alters the outcome of § 1983 claims depending solely on whether they are brought in state or federal court within the State is obviously inconsistent with the federal interest in intrastate uniformity. Pp. ... Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988) Felder v. Casey No. 87-526 Argued March 28, 1988 Decided June 22, 1988See Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490, 495 (Fla.1999) ("The trial judge's discretionary power to grant a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence is the only check against a jury that has reached an unjust decision on the facts.").The World Health Organization (WHO) is a leading authority when it comes to healthcare guidelines and recommendations. In the field of labor and delivery, the WHO has created compr...Shown Here: Introduced in House (01/11/2023) This resolution condemns the Supreme Court's holding in Dobbs v.Jackson Women's Health Organization (that there is no constitutional right to abortion) and expresses a commitment to instituting judicial reform and supporting access to abortion and the communities affected by the Court's ruling. It also urges the executive branch to advance ...Case Summary of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: The State of Missouri enacted a law restricting abortions. Four sections of the law most relevant were: (i) a preamble stating that life begins at conception; (ii) a restriction on the use of public facilities for abortions where the mother’s life is not at risk; (iii) a restriction on counseling … ….

Case Information Case Title. Megan Garcia, et al v. Pamela Casey, et al. Case Number. 21-13632. Court. Appellate - 11th Circuit. Nature of Suit. 3440 Other Civil RightsMcGehee v. Casey, No. 81-0734, mem. op. at 2 (D.D.C. September 25, 1981). Id. at 3. In this court, McGehee renews his claim that the CIA classification and censorship scheme violates the first amendment, and that, even if the scheme is constitutional, the CIA improperly classified portions of his article.Oct 8, 2023 · Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his 12-bore ...Revill said that on their way out the courthouse, the client was stopped by a police officer and an investigator. The officer told the client they had a warrant to search both him and his vehicle.Kuru v NSW [2008] is a tort law case on issues of trespass and false imprisonment. Case name & citation: Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26; (2008) 236 CLR 1. The concerned Court: High Court of Australia. Decided on: 12 June 2008. The bench of judges: Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Heydon JJ.Abstract. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health challenge on the same scale as tuberculosis, HIV, and malaria. The International Coalition to Eliminate HBV (ICE-HBV) is a coalition of experts dedicated to accelerating the discovery of a cure for chronic hepatitis B. Following extensive consultation with more than ...Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, legal case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1992, that redefined several provisions regarding abortion rights as established in Roe v. Wade (1973). Both Planned Parenthood v.Casey and Roe v.Wade were overturned by the Court in 2022.. In 1988 and 1989 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, led by Governor Robert Casey, enacted new ...Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, legal case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1992, that redefined several provisions regarding abortion rights as established in Roe v. Wade (1973). Both Planned Parenthood v.Casey and Roe v.Wade were overturned by the Court in 2022.. In 1988 and 1989 the … Revill v casey outcome, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory states that one of the disadvantages of outcome-based education is that it conflicts with the admission requirements and practices of ..., STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION March 14, 2019 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 343929 Jackson Circuit Court LC No. 17-005539-FH CASEY LAVERN OLNEY, Defendant-Appellee. Before: SAWYER, P.J., and CAVANAGH and K. F. KELLY, JJ. PER CURIAM., Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his …, REVILL v. NEWBERY: A WES T INDIA N PERSPECTIV E . ZANIF A. MCDOWELL * Th e captione d. decision 1. involve d th e questio n o f liabilit y unde r sectio n . 1 o f th ..., Mar 15, 2017 · Revill v Newbery (1996): defence of illegality. The fact of the case: On 12 March 1998 around 2am two men aged 21 and 14 attempted to break into the property, a brick shed in his allotment, of the defendant. The claimant were aware of the belongings that the defendant kept in his shed and were of the value to them., Casey et al, No. 2:2018cv02079 - Document 46 (N.D. Ala. 2019) Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 8/1/2019. Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-02079-KOB, 2:19-cv-00114-KOB (JLC) Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies., Ms. Garcia and Mr. Revill each filed separate cases against Ms. Casey, Mr. Gilliland, Deputy Ashworth, and Deputy Ratliff; the complaints alleged multiple counts, including malicious prosecution, unlawful detention, and defamation as well as violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Ms. Casey and Mr. Gilliland jointly filed motions to ..., Within the motion, Casey's argues that the Court lacks grounds to assert personal jurisdiction over the putative "opt in" collective members that did not work in Illinois ( Id. ). On April 14, 2023, Kessler responded to the pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 26). On April 28, 2023, Casey's filed their reply (Doc. 30)., A. The Arrest Video [2]. On February 23, 2017, Mr. Revill and Ms. Garcia-who are both attorneys-attended a hearing at the Blount County Courthouse in Oneonta, Alabama in representation of their client, Mr. Lloyd Edwards. (Garcia Doc. 125-1 at 2).Mr. Edwards's wife had recently filed for a protection-from-abuse order against Mr. Edwards, and Ms. Garcia and Mr. Revill attended the hearing to ..., In light of the ruling in Roe v.Wade, which established a woman's right to an abortion prior to fetal viability the plaintiffs challenged various abortion-limiting restrictions in Pennsylvania's Abortion Control Act.The act restricted public funding to abortion clinics. It also required women to obtain informed consent, notify their husbands if married, wait 24 hours before proceeding with ..., Outcome: Wheat v Lacon (1966) Definition of "occupier" More than one party can be considered an occupier if they have control over the premises: Revill v Newbery (1996) Duty of care owed to trespassers: Occupiers are still liable to take reasonable steps to avoid harm even to trespassers:, The court GRANTS the motion for the limited and exclusive purpose of taking defendant Pamela Casey's deposition on March 25, 2021. All other deadlines in the Second Revised Scheduling Order (Garcia doc. 97; Revill doc. 89) remain unchanged.Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-02079-KOB, 2:19-cv-00114-KOB(JLC) (Entered: 03/05/2021), Docket activity of federal case Revill v. Casey et al, case number 2:19-cv-00114, from Alabama Northern Court., 02-19-00325-CR. 06-24-2021. Christopher Revill, Appellant v. The State of Texas. DABNEY BASSEL JUSTICE. Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2 (b) On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1596013R. Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Bassel, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION., R v Dawson - 1985. Example case summary. Last modified: 28th Oct 2021. The defendant approached a petrol station manned by a 50 year old male. The defendants attempted a robbery with an imitation gun and a pick-axe handle. The defendants demanded money but did not touch the attendant who pressed the alarm button and the …, State, 698 So.2d 1182, 1188 (Fla.1997). In determining whether a defendant is in custody for purposes of Miranda, the primary inquiry is whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would believe that his or her freedom was curtailed to a degree associated with actual arrest. Mansfield v. State, 758 So.2d 636, 644 (Fla.2000); Bedoya v., Despite a multiplicity of opinions to the contrary and informal polling suggesting that "two thirds of those polled believe Casey Anthony to be guilty of murder", about the only things established by the outcome in State of Florida v.Casey Marie Anthony, (No. 48-2008-CF-0015606-O) are that jury trials really are marathons, not sprints and that no matter the accusation, the accused need not ..., See Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So.2d 490, 495 (Fla.1999) ("The trial judge's discretionary power to grant a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence is the only check against a jury that has reached an unjust decision on the facts.")., Sgt. Laughlin. Officer; witnessed the crash; very close with the Overstone family. Austin Hayes. Crash expert; claims the brakes are likely to have naturally come off due to deterioration. Leigh Fuller. DJ; claims to have seen Casey outside the bar as well as that Reese was incredibly drunk. This encompasses several main points regarding the ..., R v Dawson - 1985. Example case summary. Last modified: 28th Oct 2021. The defendant approached a petrol station manned by a 50 year old male. The defendants attempted a robbery with an imitation gun and a pick-axe handle. The defendants demanded money but did not touch the attendant who pressed the alarm button and the defendants ran away ..., Wade 16 and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 17 the Chief parried the majority's thrust by characterizing the issue narrowly as whether to overrule the "subsidiary rule" in Roe "that the State's interests are not constitutionally adequate to justify a ban on abortion until viability." 18 He admonished the ..., Greeley City Council on Tuesday approved a $200,000 settlement for a resident of the city who said her Fourth Amendment rights were violated and her hand and wrist injured after a 2019 arrest that resulted in the officer's departure from the department. Roseann Perez in June 2020 filed a complaint about the arrest through a Pennsylvania-based ..., v. ) ) PAMELA CASEY, SCOTT GILLILAND, ) SUE ASHWORTH, and BRIAN K. ) RATLIFF, ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO BOTH CASES . Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . This matter comes before the court on three motions for reconsideration (Garcia Docs. 49 and 55, and Revill Doc. 36), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), regarding this, Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his 12-bore ..., March 12, 2024. Casey v. Mistral Condo. Ass'n, Inc. 1st DCA, 3/6/24. No. 1D2022-1540, 2024 WL 955729. Judge Winokur. Topics: Duty, Negligence, Parol Evidence, Summary Judgment. Quick Take: A third-floor balcony gave way due to wood rot that a condo association knew about for years but had neglected to repair., This point is demonstrated clearly by Revill v Newbery. Footnote 26 In that case, the claimant burglar successfully sued the property owner for injuries inflicted by the owner on the burglar. Although the criminal law proscribes burglary, and so the claimant was in contravention of the criminal law, that did not allow the property owner to ..., Get State v. Casey, 82 P.3d 1106 (2003), Utah Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee., Jan 18, 2019 · Friday, January 18, 2019. 38 pgs COMPLAINT against Sue Ashworth, Pamela Casey, Scott Gilliland, Bryan K Ratliff, filed by Victor Revill. (KEK) Revill v. Casey et al (2:19-cv-00114), Alabama Northern District Court, Filed: 01/18/2019 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets., Friday, January 18, 2019. 38 pgs COMPLAINT against Sue Ashworth, Pamela Casey, Scott Gilliland, Bryan K Ratliff, filed by Victor Revill. (KEK) Revill v. Casey et al (2:19-cv-00114), Alabama Northern District Court, Filed: 01/18/2019 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets., Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey: A person retains the right to have an abortion, established by Roe v. Wade, but the state's compelling interest in protecting the life of an unborn child means that it can ban an abortion of a viable fetus under any circumstances except when the health of the mother is at risk. Also, laws restricting abortion should be evaluated under an undue ..., The essence of Roe, writes Justice O'Connor, was that a woman's right to have an abortion is fundamental. Citation505 U.S. 833, 112 S. Ct. 2791, 120 L. Ed. 2d 674, 1992 U.S. 4751. Brief Fact Summary. A Pennsylvania law imposed several obligations on women seeking abortions. The constitutionality of the law was brought into question., Sue Ashworth, Defendant Pamela Casey, Defendant Scott Gilliland, Defendant Bryan K Ratliff, Defendant Alabama State Bar, Miscellaneous Blount County Department of Human Resources, Miscellaneous, #24.0 - Filed 06/14/2019: ORDER This case arises out of the contemporaneous arrest and subsequent prosecution of Plaintiff Victor Revill and his former associate, Megan Garcia. It has come to the courts attention that Garcia independently filed a case that is currently pending before Chief Judge Karon Bowdre; on or before June 28, 2019 the parties SHALL file a joint report summarizing (1 ...